Experienced representation. Direct attorney access.
Clearing an Ohio criminal record begins with the final disposition
People often remember the arrest or original charge but not the final statute, offense degree or sentence. Those details matter. Ohio uses different procedures for convictions, dismissals, acquittals, grand-jury no bills and agreed misdemeanor bail forfeitures. The correct court, waiting period and available remedy depend on the official record—not merely the label appearing in an online background report.
Ohio law also distinguishes sealing from expungement. Sealing generally removes an eligible record from ordinary public access while preserving limited statutory access. Expungement is a separate remedy that can require destruction, deletion or erasure of qualifying records, subject to statutory exceptions. Some records can be sealed but not expunged, and some are excluded from both remedies.
I review every count, amendment and disposition; the final-discharge date; connected cases; pending charges; restitution and sentence obligations; and the current statutory exclusions before recommending a filing. If retained, I prepare the application, address objections and personally represent the client at the hearing. No result can be guaranteed, but the goal is a supported request under the correct statute rather than a form filed on assumptions.
What to gather before asking whether an Ohio record can be cleared
A case number, approximate year, court, arresting agency and the final charge are helpful, but you do not need every document before calling. Keep any complaint, indictment, sentencing entry, probation discharge, payment record, dismissal entry and prior background report. I can identify what must be retrieved and which court entered the controlling disposition.
Record sealing and expungement are different remedies in Ohio
ORC 2953.31 and 2953.32 distinguish the remedies. A sealing order restricts ordinary public access but allows inspection for purposes listed by law. For qualifying expungements, agencies generally must destroy, delete or erase the record so it becomes permanently irretrievable. BCI retains an expunged conviction record for the limited statutory purpose of determining qualification for law-enforcement employment. Eligibility for one remedy does not guarantee eligibility for the other.
The application generally belongs in the court that resolved the case
For an Ohio conviction, ORC 2953.32 generally directs the application to the sentencing court. For a dismissal, not-guilty finding or no bill, the statutory definition of “court” points to the court where the disposition was entered or where the grand jury reported. A case that began in a mayor’s or municipal court but ended in another court may require filing where the final judgment exists. I trace transfers and final entries before preparing an application.
Conviction sealing and expungement under ORC 2953.32
The current conviction statute permits an eligible person to seek sealing or expungement of a qualifying conviction after the applicable waiting period. The court must confirm that the offense is not excluded, the application is timely, no criminal proceeding is pending, rehabilitation has been attained to the court’s satisfaction and the applicant’s interests are not outweighed by legitimate governmental needs to maintain the record.
Waiting periods for eligible misdemeanors
Under the current version of ORC 2953.32, an application to seal one or more eligible misdemeanors may generally be filed one year after final discharge. An eligible minor misdemeanor generally has a six-month sealing period. Conviction expungement generally uses a one-year period for an eligible misdemeanor and six months for an eligible minor misdemeanor. Eligibility, connected charges and the actual final-discharge date still must be verified.
Waiting periods for eligible fourth- and fifth-degree felonies
An application to seal one or more eligible fourth- or fifth-degree felony convictions may generally be filed one year after final discharge. The offense must not fall within a statutory exclusion, including the exclusion for a felony offense of violence. A felony expungement application generally cannot be filed until ten years after the time at which the person could apply for sealing, so sealing and expungement timelines are not interchangeable.
Waiting periods and conviction-count rules for third-degree felonies
ORC 2953.32 generally permits sealing one or two eligible third-degree felony convictions three years after final discharge. The statute contains conviction-count limits and rules for when related convictions may be counted together. Some third-degree felony records are excluded based on the applicant’s complete conviction history. A precise statewide and out-of-state record review is important before filing.
Eligible felony expungement usually requires a much longer wait
For a felony that otherwise qualifies, current ORC 2953.32 generally permits an expungement application ten years after the time the person could apply for sealing that felony. That can mean a substantially longer period than the sealing timeline. The correct calculation depends on the felony degree, final-discharge date and whether the particular conviction is excluded.
Final discharge is not necessarily the conviction date
The waiting period generally runs from final discharge, not from arrest, plea or sentencing alone. I review completion of jail or prison, community control, probation, post-release control, required programs, fines, restitution and other sentence obligations. A docket marked “closed” does not necessarily answer every final-discharge question. Sentencing entries, payment records and probation information may be necessary.
Restitution, fines and court costs should not be treated as identical
Unpaid restitution or a fine can affect whether final discharge has occurred. Court costs are legally distinct and should not automatically be treated the same way. I review the sentencing language and clerk ledger to determine what was imposed, what has been paid and whether the record supports the filing date. Resolving a remaining obligation may be necessary before an otherwise eligible application can proceed.
Some convictions are excluded from sealing and expungement
Current ORC 2953.32 excludes first- and second-degree felonies, non-sexually-oriented felony offenses of violence, specified sexually oriented offenses, qualifying offenses involving a victim under thirteen, listed public-office theft offenses, first- and second-degree misdemeanor domestic violence, many traffic and driver-license convictions and some third-degree felonies based on the complete record. The final statute, degree and facts relevant to an exclusion must be checked individually.
OVI, speeding and many traffic convictions generally cannot be sealed
Convictions under Chapters 4506, 4507, 4510, 4511 and 4549 of the Ohio Revised Code—and substantially similar municipal ordinances—are excluded from the ordinary conviction remedy. This commonly includes OVI, speeding and other traffic convictions. A dismissed traffic charge presents a different analysis: sealing may be available under ORC 2953.33 even when expungement is restricted. Sealing also does not erase Ohio BMV points.
Domestic violence and protection-order records require special analysis
First- and second-degree misdemeanor domestic violence convictions are excluded from sealing and expungement. Third- and fourth-degree misdemeanor domestic violence convictions and convictions for violating a protection order have a potential sealing route, but not expungement, if the remaining requirements are met. Dismissed domestic violence and protection-order cases may be sealable, but ORC 2953.33 restricts expungement of those records.
Misdemeanor assault is not automatically treated like felony violence
ORC 2953.32 excludes a felony offense of violence that is not sexually oriented; it does not automatically exclude every misdemeanor merely because Ohio defines it as an offense of violence. A misdemeanor assault conviction may therefore present a sealing or expungement path when no other exclusion applies. Felonious assault and other felony offenses of violence require a different answer. The exact conviction—not the arrest label—controls.
Sex offenses and cases involving young victims have additional exclusions
Specified sexually oriented offenses and offenses involving a victim under thirteen are subject to important statutory exclusions, with a limited exception identified in ORC 2953.32. Registration history and the particular conviction matter. These cases should not be evaluated through a generic online checklist, and a dismissed charge may have different sealing and expungement consequences from a conviction.
Talk with the attorney who will handle your case
Experienced, personal help for Ohio Record Sealing and Expungement.
I have extensive experience handling traffic, OVI, misdemeanor and felony matters in the courts surrounding my Strongsville office. Call me to discuss your situation. If you retain Godinsky Law, I personally review the evidence, appear in court and guide you through the case.
Dismissed charges and not-guilty findings under ORC 2953.33
A dismissed case or acquittal can remain visible on a court docket or background report. ORC 2953.33 generally permits an application after the dismissal or not-guilty finding is entered, subject to connected-charge rules, pending proceedings and the statute’s expungement exclusions. A dismissal without prejudice also requires the court to examine whether the applicable statute of limitations has expired. Dismissal does not always mean the record disappears automatically.
Grand-jury no bills have a separate two-year timeline
A person against whom a grand jury returned a no bill may generally apply after two years from the report of the no bill, subject to connected-case rules and other statutory conditions. A no bill is not the same as a municipal-court dismissal or a not-guilty verdict. The common pleas court record and date of the grand-jury report should be confirmed before calculating eligibility.
An amended charge can materially change eligibility
A case may begin as domestic violence, assault, theft, felony drug possession or another serious allegation and end with a different misdemeanor or lower-level felony conviction. I review the actual plea, amended complaint or indictment and final judgment rather than deciding from the original accusation. Separately dismissed counts, traffic companions and other cases arising from the same event still must be considered.
Connected charges can prevent piecemeal record clearing
ORC 2953.61 generally prevents sealing or expunging one charge from an event while a connected charge with a different disposition remains ineligible. The statute contains a limited exception when exactly one connected conviction is an eligible non-OVI traffic offense and the remaining records otherwise qualify; that exception does not apply to a current CDL or commercial learner’s permit holder. Every count from the incident should be reviewed together.
Pending criminal proceedings can delay an application
The court must determine whether criminal proceedings are pending. A new case in another Ohio county—or sometimes outside Ohio—can affect an application even when the old record otherwise appears eligible. Tell me about every current charge before filing. Waiting or resolving the pending matter may be necessary, depending on the statute and circumstances.
The court schedules a hearing and the prosecutor may object
For a conviction application, ORC 2953.32 generally requires a hearing between forty-five and ninety days after filing and notice to the prosecutor at least sixty days before the hearing. The prosecutor may submit a written objection, and a victim or representative may be heard when applicable. Dismissal and acquittal applications have their own hearing framework under ORC 2953.33. Court scheduling and record processing can extend the practical timeline.
Eligibility alone does not make approval automatic
In conviction cases, the court considers rehabilitation and balances the applicant’s interests against legitimate governmental reasons to retain the record. Employment, education, treatment, family responsibilities, community involvement, time without new offenses and the practical effect of the record may help explain why relief matters. Those facts do not replace statutory eligibility, but they may be important when the prosecutor objects or the court requests support.
One person may need applications in more than one court
A person with records in Berea, Parma, Medina, Elyria and a county common pleas court may need separate filings because each court controls its own cases. Current ORC 2953.32 permits more than one case from the same court to be requested in a single application, but it does not turn unrelated courts into one filing. I map the full record and identify the correct sequence before work begins.
Who can still see a sealed Ohio record?
Sealing restricts ordinary public access, but ORC 2953.34 permits inspection and use for specified criminal-justice, law-enforcement, probation, licensing, public-safety employment and background-check purposes. A sealed prior conviction may also remain usable in a later criminal proceeding when otherwise admissible. Tell me about a regulated profession, work with children, immigration issue or special background check so the limits can be discussed accurately.
Private background reports and online references may update separately
A court order directs official record treatment; it does not guarantee that every private database, search result or news report disappears immediately. Keep a certified or file-stamped copy of the order. If a private report later displays stale information, identify the company, report date and exact entry so an appropriate correction request can be considered. A continuing online reference does not necessarily mean the court failed to issue the order.
Record-sealing and expungement help in Cuyahoga County courts
I handle eligible applications involving records from Strongsville Mayor’s Court, Berea Municipal Court, Parma Municipal Court, Rocky River Municipal Court, Lakewood Municipal Court, North Royalton Mayor’s Court, North Olmsted Mayor’s Court, Middleburg Heights Mayor’s Court and the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas. The court-specific pages explain where the case belongs and issues commonly associated with those records.
Record-sealing and expungement help in Medina County courts
My Medina County practice includes eligible records from Medina Municipal Court, Wadsworth Municipal Court, Brunswick Mayor’s Court and Medina County Common Pleas Court. A Medina County felony that was amended to an eligible misdemeanor, an eligible felony conviction or a dismissed felony case requires review of the common pleas and any related municipal-court records before filing.
Record-sealing and expungement help in Lorain County courts
I also handle eligible applications involving Elyria Municipal Court, Avon Lake Municipal Court and Lorain County Common Pleas Court. This can include dismissed charges, eligible misdemeanor convictions, eligible felony convictions and felony cases amended to qualifying misdemeanors. The actual disposition and court—not merely the city of arrest—determine the filing route.
Direct representation by Ohio expungement attorney Chris Godinsky
When you call Godinsky Law, you speak directly with me rather than an intake department. If retained, I review the docket and statewide record, identify the correct remedy and court, prepare the application and supporting information, respond to eligibility or objection issues and personally appear for the hearing. Call (440) 826-3400 for a free phone consultation about the record you want to clear.