Experienced representation. Direct attorney access.
A detailed defense begins with the ages, the evidence and the exact statutory elements
Ohio Revised Code 2907.04 generally applies when a person who is eighteen or older engages in sexual conduct with a person who is thirteen or older but under sixteen and the accused knows the person’s age or is reckless in that regard. This is a specific age-based offense. It should not be confused with every other Ohio charge involving a minor.
The actual dates of birth and the precise age difference can affect whether the allegation is a misdemeanor or a second-, third- or fourth-degree felony. Evidence about age can also include messages, dating profiles, social-media pages, school information, photographs, statements to friends and what each person allegedly said. I review the complete record rather than relying on a police summary or selected screenshots.
I personally examine whether sexual conduct can be proved, the identity of the people and accounts involved, the relationship timeline, age representations, device extractions, deleted or recovered messages, photographs, location data, witnesses, medical or DNA evidence and the circumstances of any police interview. I also explain potential prison and sex-offender registration consequences before major decisions are made.
What ORC 2907.04 prohibits
The statute generally prohibits a person who is eighteen or older from engaging in sexual conduct with another person who is thirteen or older but under sixteen when the accused knows the age or is reckless in that regard. The State must prove the alleged sexual conduct, both relevant ages and the required mental state concerning age.
The 13-to-15 age range matters
ORC 2907.04 is directed to an alleged participant who is at least thirteen but has not yet turned sixteen. A person under thirteen implicates different Ohio statutes, while an allegation involving someone sixteen or older requires analysis under other potentially applicable laws. Dates of birth must be verified from reliable records.
Age difference can change the offense level
The ordinary offense is a fourth-degree felony. If the accused is less than four years older, the statute provides for a first-degree misdemeanor. If the accused is ten or more years older, the offense is a third-degree felony. A qualifying prior sex-offense conviction can elevate the charge to a second-degree felony with a mandatory prison term.
How the age difference should be calculated
The calculation should use the actual birth dates and the date of the alleged conduct—not rounded ages or an imprecise police narrative. Where conduct is alleged over a date range, the timing may affect the statutory degree. I confirm the dates before assessing penalties or discussing a resolution.
Knowledge or recklessness concerning age
The State must prove that the accused knew the other person was between thirteen and fifteen or was reckless in that regard. Ohio law defines recklessness separately. The analysis can involve what was said, what information was available, the person’s appearance and circumstances, profiles, messages, school references and whether contrary age representations were made.
Age representations and online profiles
A claim that someone gave a different age does not automatically end the case, but it can be important to the required knowledge-or-recklessness element. I preserve complete profiles, account data and conversations, identify when statements were made and examine whether the prosecution’s screenshots omit relevant context.
What counts as sexual conduct
ORC 2907.04 concerns sexual conduct as defined in ORC 2907.01, not merely conversation, flirtation or every form of touching. The prosecution must prove the alleged act fits the statutory definition. Medical evidence, DNA, messages and statements must be evaluated for what they establish—and what they do not.
Identity and account-authentication issues
Digital communications may come from shared devices, false profiles, compromised accounts or usernames that do not prove who was typing. I examine subscriber records, device possession, login data, timestamps, metadata, IP information where available and whether the evidence reliably connects the accused to the communication or alleged act.
Complete messages matter more than isolated screenshots
Selected messages can change meaning when separated from the surrounding conversation. I seek the full thread, attachments, dates, deleted material and communications on other platforms. I compare the digital timeline with witnesses, video, work or school records and location evidence.
Police interviews and recorded statements
Investigators may ask questions designed to establish age, knowledge, identity and sexual conduct. An attempted explanation can become a key part of the prosecution. Speak with a defense attorney before agreeing to an interview, making a written statement or consenting to a phone or account search.
Talk with the attorney who will handle your case
Experienced, personal help for Medina County Unlawful Sexual Conduct with a Minor Defense.
I have experience defending serious felony and sex-offense allegations. If retained for a Medina County sex-offense case, I personally review the indictment, recorded accounts, medical and DNA evidence, phones, messages and other digital material and handle the Common Pleas Court representation with discretion.
Phone searches and digital-forensic evidence
These cases frequently involve a seized phone or warrant for accounts and cloud data. I examine the warrant affidavit, probable cause, scope, extraction method, account attribution, timestamps and whether the forensic report accurately distinguishes user-created data from automated, cached or synchronized material.
Medical and DNA evidence
Medical or DNA evidence may be offered to support identity, contact or timing, but its meaning depends on collection, chain of custody, source attribution and the proposition actually disputed. The evidence does not independently establish what the accused knew about age.
Prior convictions and enhancement allegations
A prior conviction for a listed sex offense can significantly increase the degree and sentencing exposure. The prosecution must rely on a qualifying prior conviction and accurate records. I review the prior judgment, statute, degree and identity instead of assuming an enhancement is valid.
Potential prison and sentencing consequences
A first-degree misdemeanor, fourth-degree felony, third-degree felony and second-degree felony carry very different sentencing frameworks. The second-degree felony provision includes a mandatory prison term. The precise degree, prior record, offense date and any plea amendment must be analyzed under the current sentencing statutes.
Sex-offender classification and registration
A conviction can create Ohio sex-offender classification and reporting duties. Classification may depend on the offense degree, age difference and statutory circumstances. Registration duration, verification frequency and other consequences must be reviewed before any plea or sentencing decision.
Bond and no-contact orders
The court may impose no-contact, residence, travel or internet-related conditions. Follow the written order even if the other person attempts contact. I explain the conditions and address necessary modifications through the court rather than risking a new allegation or bond violation.
Medina County Common Pleas Court procedure
After indictment, the case may proceed through arraignment, discovery, pretrial conferences, evidentiary motions, expert consultation, negotiations and trial. I appear with the client, review the evidence personally and explain the risks and options at each stage.
Work directly with Chris Godinsky
If retained, I personally examine the age evidence, complete communications, device records, statements and scientific evidence and handle the Medina County Common Pleas Court representation. Call (440) 826-3400 for a free, confidential phone consultation.
Call now for a free phone consultation
Call (440) 826-3400 and speak directly with Chris Godinsky. If retained, I personally review the evidence, communicate with you and handle the representation from the initial assessment through the court proceedings.